Usury Laws, Anyone?

by Odysseas Papadimitriou on September 28, 2011

usury interest ratesEvery so often, talk of curbing excessive lending practices by instituting usury laws at a federal level resurfaces, and speeches are made, hearings are held and editorials are written, but nothing ever comes of it. This begs a couple of questions: For starters, what are usury laws exactly, and—perhaps more importantly—do we need them?

Usury laws are those that prevent high interest rates, and as a result typically garner popular support, especially in times such as these when the economy is fledgling and anger toward financial institutions is running high. However, you cannot truly evaluate the merit of these laws, which at their basis are a means of forcing lenders to serve the greater public good, without understanding their practical effect.

Would they solve anything?
Obviously, the goal of any proposed usury legislation would be to force lenders into lowering the interest rates that they offer to high-risk customers. After all, people already getting low rates don’t need any assistance. The problem with this kind of thinking is fairly clear. Congress wants to step in and force lenders to abolish high interest rates under the assumption that lenders will simply lower their highest rates while continuing to approve loans at the same rate. They won’t.

Congress is unlikely to force lenders to approve loans, so usury laws would simply result in lenders shutting out a sizeable consumer segment. Usury laws therefore don’t nudge lenders toward social service but instead force them to avoid doing business with anyone whose credit warrants an interest rate higher than what politicians have deemed excessive.

But who is Congress to tell you what interest rate you can or cannot accept when borrowing money? Do they understand your circumstances when you decide to get a loan? Usury laws assume that people who take a 40% interest rate simply don’t know any better, but the truth is that most people who take loans with high interest rates do so because they need the money. And with usury laws in place, that money might not be available when they need it most.

Bad credit, out of luck
Imagine that your car breaks down and you need to borrow money to fix it ASAP because you cannot perform your job without it (e.g. you are an independent contractor). Problem is, your credit history indicates that you’re likely to get approved for a loan with a 20% interest rate. If a usury-law-borne interest rate cap of, say, 16% happened to be in place at the time, the bank would consider you too much of a risk to legally receive a loan. They would turn you down. You wouldn’t get the money. Your car wouldn’t get fixed. As a result, your income would go down, making it difficult to pay your other bills and putting your already-insufficient credit in jeopardy of becoming even worse. If, on the other hand, you’d gotten that loan, the car would have gotten fixed and you would have been free to move on with your life.

Conclusion
Ultimately, we are a free people living in a free country. The government should not be telling us which loans we can or cannot take. Their job is to make sure that business practices are fair. The details of loans must therefore be clearly disclosed so that consumers can make informed decisions, but the decisions are still the consumers’ to make. Congress is composed primarily of wealthy people who probably have good credit; the restrictions they are putting into law will probably never affect them. And while these laws make Congress look like they are in touch with the average person, in the end, they’re not actually lowering interest rates for anyone. Instead, they’re merely preventing people with bad credit from getting loans which they may desperately need.

This is a line of thinking that we, as a free market economy, cannot afford to take. The restrictions imposed by usury laws are bad on all sectors of the economy, and Congress as well as those who jump on the federal usury law bandwagon whenever it pops up must understand that. What’s more, its time for states with usury laws to also abolish them.

Discussion

Raging Wisdom
You might enjoy this. At one point, I confront the rep with the concept of usury.nnI made a video protest recently for my blog. It is quite funny even if you are pro-megabank. I called my credit card's customer service line to do some negotiating. Having a bit of leverage, I thought it presented a great opportunity to mess with them a little and make a few points about the unfairness of the credit card lending system. Since it's a protest at home, I called it my kitchen counterstrike against Bank of America.. http://www.ragingwisdom.com/?p=508
November 21 at 13:53 pm
Hope to Prosper
I like the usury law because it protects consumers from being trapped in debt at interest rates they can't afford to pay off. When I was a kid, the interst limit was 21.99% and it served consumers well. The banks skirted this law to benefit themselves, not consumers.

Also, many members of congress are notoriously bad money managers, despite having very high incomes.
October 2 at 21:53 pm

Relevant Articles

Most Popular Topics

Most Popular Articles

Subscribe

Receive the latest advice and deals:

Wallet Hub Facebook Twitter Google Plus

Submit A Post

Want to be a guest blogger? Submit a Post